The Securities & Exchange Board of
India (SEBI) recently gave its go ahead
for the launch on long duration
options on the popular Sensex and
Nifty indices with tenures up to three
years.The move is aimed at helping
investors to hedge their positions in the market for three years compared
to the existing three-month duration.
The decision is based on the
recommendations of SEBI’s
Derivatives Market Review
Committee headed by Prof M.
Rammohan Rao. The product will be
available with immediate effect,
according to a SEBI circular
Pages
▼
Friday, February 15, 2008
SEBI TO CURB IPO LISTING VOLATILITY
In order to curb excessive
speculation and volatility of a stock
at the time of listing, market regulator
Securities & Exchange Board of India
(SEBI) has proposed a 25% price
band on the issue price, on the listing
day, of an IPO upto Rs.250 Crore in
size. This would not apply in case of
recommencement of trading in equity
shares of a company on the stock
exchange.
GO AHEAD FOR VOLATILITY INDEX LAUNCH: SEBI
Market regulator Securities and
Exchange Board of India (SEBI)
recently gave its green signal for the
launch of Volatility Index by the
Bombay and National Stock
Exchanges.
SEBI TO OVERHAUL DISCLOSURE NORMS FOR LISTED COMPANIES
A sub-committee of the Securities and
Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has
suggested continuous disclosures
by listed companies instead of the
current practice of disclosures only
at the time of issue of capital.
In a report on “Integrated
Disclosures” put out for public
comments, the Sub-Committee on
Integrated Disclosures (SCID) has
said the areas of disclosures should
include the history of the company,
capital structure, business strategy,
promoters and others./ The
disclosures relate to company
information, excluding financial and
accounting disclosures.
IPO-BOUND COMPANIES MAY HAVE TO E-FILE DISCLOSURES
All companies going public
henceforth will have to mandatory
upload their corporate disclosures
on the Corporate Filing and
Dissemination System (CFDS), an
electronic platform developed and
managed by the stock exchanges,
NSE and BSE.
Corporate disclosures will include
financial statements comprising
balance sheet, profit & loss account
and full version of annual report;
half yearly financial statements
including cash flow statements and
quarterly financial statements,
corporate governance reports,
shareholding pattern statement,
action taken against any company
by any regulatory agency,
disclosures of subs acquisition &
takeover & SEBI insider trading
regulation etc.
NEW NORM FOR FII REGISTRATION SOON
To put an end to the uncertainties
over Foreign Institutional Investor’s
(FIIs) investments in the country,
market regulator SEBI is set to notify
the new guidelines for their
registration. Accordingly, entities
registered in Non-International
Organization of Securities
Commissions (IOSCO) compliant
jurisdiction may not be able to
register as FII here.
THE DISCUSSION PAPER ON PUBLIC HOLDINGS PROPOSED
It is proposed to amend the Securities
Contracts (Regulation) Rules, 1957
(SCRR) to provide for both initial and
continuous listing requirements in the
following manner:
- The standards for initial listing and continuous listing may be prescribed in the SCR rules and may be uniform.
- For a company to be listed and continue to be listed, it must have a public stake of 25%. Otherwise, the promoters, management and the company may be jointly and severally liable to bring the public holding to 25% within 3 months, in the manner prescribed by SEBI, failing which appropriate enforcement action, including delisting, may be taken.
- There should not be any discrimination between a Government company and non Government company.
This proposals can be viewed at
website of Ministry and comments
are invited by 28th February 2008 at
shuvom2002@gmail.com
PERMISSION FOR SHORT SELLING OF EQUITY SHARES BY SEBI REGISTERED FIIS
It has been decided by RBI in
consultation with Government of
India and SEBI, to permit Foreign
Institutional Investors (FIIs)
registered with SEBI and sub accounts
of FIIs to short sell, lend
and borrow equity shares of Indian
Companies. Short selling, lending and
borrowing of equity shares of Indian
companies shall be subject to such
conditions as may be prescribed in
that behalf by the Reserve Bank and
the SEBI / other regulatory agencies
from time to time.
FDI IN COMMODITY EXCHANGES, REFINING & INDUSTRIAL PARKS ALLOWED
The Government liberalized the
Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) cap
across various sectors.
Commodity Exchanges: FDI up to 26 percent and the FII up to 23 percent have been allowed in commodity exchanges subject to the condition that no single investor would hold more than five per cent.
Petroleum refining by PSUs : hiking the equity cap to 49% (from the existing 26 per cent) with prior approval of the FIPB.
Industrial Park : The Cabinet has also decided to exempt foreign investment in industrial parks from the provisions of Press Note 2 (2005) that stipulates conditions such as minimum capitalization and a three year lock in.
Construction development : investment by registered FIIs under the portfolio investment scheme would be distinct from the FDI and outside the provisions of Press Note 2 (2005).
Credit information services : Added in permitted FDI as NBFCs. Besides the minimum capitalization of $10 million for the wholly owned subsidiaries and $5 million for joint ventures with Indian partners, the Press Note 2 specifies that original investment cannot be repatriated before a period of three years from completion of minimum capitalization. It also stipulates other conditions such as minimum area to be developed.
Commodity Exchanges: FDI up to 26 percent and the FII up to 23 percent have been allowed in commodity exchanges subject to the condition that no single investor would hold more than five per cent.
Petroleum refining by PSUs : hiking the equity cap to 49% (from the existing 26 per cent) with prior approval of the FIPB.
Industrial Park : The Cabinet has also decided to exempt foreign investment in industrial parks from the provisions of Press Note 2 (2005) that stipulates conditions such as minimum capitalization and a three year lock in.
Construction development : investment by registered FIIs under the portfolio investment scheme would be distinct from the FDI and outside the provisions of Press Note 2 (2005).
Credit information services : Added in permitted FDI as NBFCs. Besides the minimum capitalization of $10 million for the wholly owned subsidiaries and $5 million for joint ventures with Indian partners, the Press Note 2 specifies that original investment cannot be repatriated before a period of three years from completion of minimum capitalization. It also stipulates other conditions such as minimum area to be developed.
NORMS FOR NBFCS SETTING UP SHOP ABROAD
NON-BANKING Financial
Companies (NBFCs), planning to
establish overseas presence, will
have to comply with a new set of
norms prescribed by the Reserve
Bank of India in its draft guidelines
issued on January 24, 2008.
NBFCs seeking an NOC from RBI
for setting up a subsidiary, joint
venture, investments or
representative body have to comply
with the norms specified in the draft
guidelines. The guidelines are –
maintaining capital risk adequate
ratio at 15% in the case of deposit taking
NBFCs and for non-deposit
taking NBFCs, the ratio is set at 10%.
Another crucial condition is to limit
the Non-Performing Assets (NPAs)
to 5%. Besides, NBFCs should have
a three year record of registering
profit if it has to apply for setting up
an overseas presence. Lastly, NBFCs must have a net owned fund
to be eligible to apply for an NOC.
If any NBFC is seeking an NOC from
RBI for investing in its overseas arm,
RBI will give the nod on the condition
that the overseas presence is not
used as a shell company that does
not have any significant operations
there. Besides, RBI needs to be
satisfied that the overseas company
would not be used for mobilizing
resources for creating assets for its
Indian operations.
RBI also seeks to limit the Indian
NBFC’s liabilities to the equities
commitment to the overseas arm.
Further to it, the Indian company is
also not allowed to extend any credit
or guarantee to its overseas arm,
directly or indirectly.
DUTY CUT ON 539 ITEMS UNDER PACT WITH SINGAPORE
The Finance Ministry has cut customs
duty on 539 items as part of an
agreed tariff elimination package under
the Comprehensive Economic
Cooperation Agreement (CECA)
with Singapore.
COMPENSATION FOR CST CUT: STATES NOT FOR VAT RATE HIKE
State Government has opposed the
finance ministry’s proposal to raise
the Value-Added Tax (VAT) rate on
a number of items from 4 per cent to
5 per cent. The move was suggested
to compensate states for losses due
to reduction in the Central Sales Tax
(CST) rate by one percentage point
from April this year. States also declined
to levy VAT on textiles.
CREDIT OF SERVICE TAX AGAINST THE CONSTRUCTION OF IMMOVABLE PROPERTY WHICH IS TO BE RENTED OUT–NOT ALLOWED - AMENDMENT TO CIR. NO. 96/7/2007-ST
Issue:- whether the credit of Service
tax paid for various services used
in the construction if immovable
property, which is to be rented out
in future, will be available against
the payment of service tax on “Renting
of Immovable Property” service.
Clarification:- As per CBEC, the credit cannot be taken as the services are used to construct immovable property. Which is neither subjected to Excise duty or service tax, and also Input credit of service tax can only be taken only if output is a service or goods liable to excise duty or service tax. Since the end product neither being a “service” nor “goods”, the credit shall not be available.
Editorial Remarks: - This clarification is open to challenge in the court as far fetched. If the objective of construction is renting, there is a clear cut case of input service
Clarification:- As per CBEC, the credit cannot be taken as the services are used to construct immovable property. Which is neither subjected to Excise duty or service tax, and also Input credit of service tax can only be taken only if output is a service or goods liable to excise duty or service tax. Since the end product neither being a “service” nor “goods”, the credit shall not be available.
Editorial Remarks: - This clarification is open to challenge in the court as far fetched. If the objective of construction is renting, there is a clear cut case of input service
MAURITIUS DTAA MAY BE FINETUNED TO SURVIVE TAXHOUNDS
The controversial Double Tax
Avoidance Agreement (DTAA)
between India and Mauritius is likely
to survive despite pressure from the
income-tax authorities. The pact may
be re-worked, but not scrapped,
thanks to the lobbying by a high- level delegation headed by
Mauritius Prime Minister
Navinchandra Ramgoolam.
The pact, crucial for Foreign
Institutional Investors (FIIs)
investing in India, has been facing
an uncertain future since the
revenue department in the finance
ministry has opposed to loopholes
that allow exploitation of the pact
by intended beneficiaries. Several
foreign companies, for example,
have invested in India through what
is known as the Mauritius route.
NO TDS ON TRAINING FEES PAID TO INSTITUTIONS
The Delhi tribunal has held that
payments to institutions providing
technical training to employees of
assessee are not payments for
providing professional services and
would not attract withholding tax
provisions of 194J. The assessee, a
joint venture company, made
payment (including tuition fees and
training –related expense) to a
management development institute
for providing advanced
management training to its director
without withholding any tax (TDS).
According to the assessing officer,
the payments were for professional
services and hence liable for TDS
under section 194J of the I-T Act.
Accordingly, he held the assessee
as an ‘assessee in default’ and levied
penalty for non-deduction of TDS.
The tribunal observed that the
institute was providing management
training and running various kinds
of programmes and by doing so it
was merely ‘imparting knowledge’ to
the participants. By no stretch of
imagination it can be said that the
participant was a recipient of
professional services from the
institute. Hence, the tribunal held
that it was not liable to withhold the tax.
BUSINESS LOSSES CAN BE SET-OFF AGAINST CAPITAL GAINS : ITAT
The Chennai Income Tax Tribunal has
held that business loss has to be setoff
against capital gains (if any) and
only the balance loss can be carried
forward to the next year. In computing
the total income, the assessee did not
adjust the business loss against capital
gains on the ground that section 71(2),
which uses the word ‘may’, provides a
option to the assessee either to setoff
or not to set-off business losses
against the capital gains.
The business loss has to be first setoff
against the income under the other
head in the same year and only the
balance loss should be carried forward.
The tribunal agreed with the revenue
authorities and observed that
combined reading of section 72(1) and
section 71(2) suggests that losses
under one head must be adjusted
against income under any head except
‘capital gains’. Further, if the assessee
is having losses under any head and
income under the head ‘capital gains’
also, then the assessee has the option
of adjusting the losses against
incomes of any of the heads or the capital gains. Thus, the word ‘may’
used in section 71(2) is meant to give
flexibility to the assessee only for
the relevant year.
CASES INVOLVING TAX REFUND OF OVER RS.5 LAKH UNDER SCRUTINY FRAME
The Finance Ministry has issued
instructions to field formations to
ensure that cases involving final
refunds of over Rs. 5 lakh do not remain
outside the scope of scrutiny
selection.
I-T REFUND LIST FOR SALARIED TAX PAYERS
The Income Tax Department has put on its website the list of income tax
refunds of all salaried tax-payers that
could not be sent for want of correct
addresses. The salaried tax payers who
have not received refunds for
assessment years 2003-04 to 2006-07
can log on to the website
www.incometaxindia.gov.in for further
information.
INCOME FROM SARs TO BE TAXED: ITAT
Share Appreciation Rights (SARs),
an innovative compensation
package offered by many
multinational companies to senior
employees, will be taxed. The Income
Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT),
Mumbai, a quasi-judicial tax
authority, has held that redemption
of such rights is no longer tax-free
since the ‘income’ generated is
nothing but ‘deferred wages” and is
taxable like any other earnings.
This ruling on SARs, a variant of
Employees’ Stock Option (ESOP),
has reversed earlier orders given by
several ITAT benches, when allowed
such benefits to be tax-free.
E-PAYMENT IS NOW MANDATORY
The optional scheme of electronic
payment of taxes for income-tax
payers was introduced in 2004. With
a view to expand the scope of
electronic payment of taxes, it is
proposed to make the scheme
mandatory w.e.f. 1st April, 2008 for
the following categories of taxpayers:-
- All corporate assesses;
- All assesses (other than company) to whom provisions of section 44 AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 are applicable:
Tax-payers can make electronic
payment of taxes through the internet
banking facility offered by the
authorized banks with an option to
make electronic payment of taxes
through internet by way of credit or
debit cards
AUTONOMY COMING FMC’s WAY THROUGH ORDINANCE
The Cabinet has okayed a plan to
issue an ordinance to make changes
in the Forward Contracts Regulation
Act, 1952. The amendments would
primarily empower commodity market
regulator Forward Markets
Commission (FMC) as outlined under
the still pending Forward Contracts
Regulation (Amendment) Bill, 2006.
The proposed law will elevate the
FMC from a government department
to an independent regulator. Once this
goes through, banks, foreign funds
and other financial institutions too
can look forward to participation in
commodity markets.
REITs LIKELY TO GET TAXGAINS COATING
SEBI has made a case to the
Government to consider giving tax
benefits to Real Estate Investment
Trusts (REITs) on the lines of mutual
funds to encourage bigger investors’
participation. The Government may
propose the tax treatment for REITs
in Budget 2008 subject to the prior
approval of SEBI in regards to the
REIT structure. REITs are seen as low
volatile investment options offering
steady income through all market
conditions, given that they invest
largely in income-generating real estate.
REITs are investment vehicles
registered under the Indian Trusts
Act and have to be approved by
SEBI. They are managed by
professional real estate management
companies and can invest in
properties including apartments and
malls. Investors can buy units in REIT just as in a mutual fund. They will
earn dividend income on the unit or
shares of an REIT.
The Income Tax law, now. provides
for a pass through status for mutual
funds and all income the funds earns
is tax-free. The unit holders do not
have to pay tax on their dividend
income but any income distributed by
the mutual fund attracts a dividend distribution
tax depending on the
fund’s nature.
SEBI has recommended extending a
similar tax treatment to REITs. This
would mean giving them a pass through
status and exempting all
income earned by REITs from tax.
Investors holding REIT units should
also be spared from paying tax on
dividends. But income distributed by
the REIT would attract dividend distribution
tax.
SEBI has suggested in its draft
guidelines that REITs should
distribute not less than 90% of their
net income after tax as dividend to unit holders.
NEW DRAFT ON M&A REGULATIONS : CCI
The Competition Commission of
India (CCI) has come out with
amended draft regulations pertaining
to penalties, companies of
production and merger, acquisition
and amalgamations.
The Competition Act, 2007, cleared
by Parliament in September’07, had
proposed that any company with
assets of Rs. 1,000 Crore or more and
a turnover of Rs. 3,000 Crore or more
has to mandatory seek the CCI’s
approval for any ‘combination’
(merger, acquisition or amalgamation)
within 30 days of linking the deal. The
CCI will give its verdict within 210 days.
LLP TO BE TABLED IN BUDGET SESSION
The Government will table a bill in
the coming budget session of
Parliament to introduce a hybrid form
of business entity called Limited
Liability Partnership (LLP). The LLP
Bill was introduced by the
Government in Rajya Sabha and was
referred to a Standing Committee, which recently submitted its report.
A new bill to replace the existing
company law with a modern
sophisticated one would also to be
introduced before the Parliament in
the coming budget session.
CORPORATE DEBT RESTRUCTURING TO HAVE MANDATORY RECOMPENSATION
Corporates, which have restructured
their loans through the CDR route,
have to pay re compensation to
bankers if they want early exit from
CDR. As per the current formula,
companies have to pay a steep price
to exit CDR. Now the company has
to repay the principal that lenders
had sacrificed while restructuring the
loan. Also, they have to pay interest
rate which is calculated as BPLR plus
term premium and credit risk
premium. The interest rate is
calculated on the compound basis
which is pinching the borrowers.
EASIER INVESTMENT RULES FOR INSURANCE COMPANIES LIKELY
Insurance companies are all set to
get the freedom to invest more in the
equity and debt markets following a
comprehensive overhaul of the
investment regulation norms.
According to the recommendations
of the Investment Advisory
Committee, insurance companies will
be given more freedom in deciding
the discretionary investments. These
investments are made mainly in initial
public offers of Companies and
venture capital funds in order to
channelise more funds from the
insurance sector to infrastructure
developers without bothering about
collateral or their record of interest payments.
IPO: A DILEMMA OF FREE PRICINGMARKET HIT BACK GREED
The recent development in the primary capital market in respect
of free pricing of Initial Public Offer has awakened and
made jittery all the policy makers, qualified institutional investors,
regulators and more importantly the capital market participants
and investors.
The Reliance Power IPO, one of the largest Initial Public Offerings
was offered to public in January 2008 with price tag of Rs.
450 per share for institutional investors and Rs. 430 per share
for retail investors. This company has a number of projects
planned by them whereas actual projects running or already
implemented, there are none to mention. There is no material
earning per share and even after considering such a large public
issue, the book value per share would be about 1/10th of the
issue price. In the absence of existing track record of earnings
and in the absence of existing operations or any major assets,
the justification based on which the Merchant Banker arrived
at public offer price is incomprehensible. The issue was substantially
oversubscribed in view of established and strong
track record of the promoter and the buoyant capital market.
On first day of listing itself the share closed at a price of Rs.372
thereby causing loss to investors. Above all serious question
come up into mind – whether the IPO Pricing Policy and Regulations in are marred by aberrations?
In the meanwhile due to several reasons including disturbance in US economy as well as liquidity tightness in the Indian financial market, the capital market witnessed another major fall in the 2nd half of January, 2008 and 1st half of February, 2008.In the same backdrop, the IPO of EMMAAR MGF Real Estate and Wolk hard Hospital also approached the market but had to make a hasty retreat by recalling their issues in view of poor response from the market. The market rejected high priced issues devoid of convincing track record or prospects. The pricing of public issue made by the companies, for several decades had been regulated through the approvals by Controller of Capital Issues, which used to arrive at the proposed price for initial public offering or other public issues on the basis of specific formula based on actual performance of the Company. The control pricing was given away by SEBI and a formula of market determined free pricing was adopted. In this scenario of free pricing the responsibility of the issuer as well as of the Merchant Banker is indeed high. SEBI needs to mandate Merchant Bankers to take the responsibility of pricing an IPO based on transparent assumptions and basis for arriving at a price for the proposed public issue. There are number of widely accepted valuation technique and methodology and issuers as well as Merchant bankers may consider permitting adoption of most appropriate alternative. In spite of this, the profit earning capacity and future projections will still remain uncertain and no codification or guidelines or transparency can give a perfect solution. It will, however, be appropriate to ensure that the basis of valuation is transparent and due diligence is undertaken by the Merchant Bankers as well as Issuers to undertake valuation in a reasonable manner. The long term success of the Issuer as well as of the capital market will be to take only reasonable valuation and not to provide undue advantage to the promoters and / or issuers. Leaving a reasonable margin for the investors will ensure long-term reputation of the issuing company, promoters and Merchant Bankers. SEBI can also consider mandating that the promoters should at least bring in 10-15% of the proposed issue at the same price in cash, irrespective of the existing capital or strength in the Company in case of an IPO. This will facilitate a balancing between free pricing and reasonableness.
In the meanwhile due to several reasons including disturbance in US economy as well as liquidity tightness in the Indian financial market, the capital market witnessed another major fall in the 2nd half of January, 2008 and 1st half of February, 2008.In the same backdrop, the IPO of EMMAAR MGF Real Estate and Wolk hard Hospital also approached the market but had to make a hasty retreat by recalling their issues in view of poor response from the market. The market rejected high priced issues devoid of convincing track record or prospects. The pricing of public issue made by the companies, for several decades had been regulated through the approvals by Controller of Capital Issues, which used to arrive at the proposed price for initial public offering or other public issues on the basis of specific formula based on actual performance of the Company. The control pricing was given away by SEBI and a formula of market determined free pricing was adopted. In this scenario of free pricing the responsibility of the issuer as well as of the Merchant Banker is indeed high. SEBI needs to mandate Merchant Bankers to take the responsibility of pricing an IPO based on transparent assumptions and basis for arriving at a price for the proposed public issue. There are number of widely accepted valuation technique and methodology and issuers as well as Merchant bankers may consider permitting adoption of most appropriate alternative. In spite of this, the profit earning capacity and future projections will still remain uncertain and no codification or guidelines or transparency can give a perfect solution. It will, however, be appropriate to ensure that the basis of valuation is transparent and due diligence is undertaken by the Merchant Bankers as well as Issuers to undertake valuation in a reasonable manner. The long term success of the Issuer as well as of the capital market will be to take only reasonable valuation and not to provide undue advantage to the promoters and / or issuers. Leaving a reasonable margin for the investors will ensure long-term reputation of the issuing company, promoters and Merchant Bankers. SEBI can also consider mandating that the promoters should at least bring in 10-15% of the proposed issue at the same price in cash, irrespective of the existing capital or strength in the Company in case of an IPO. This will facilitate a balancing between free pricing and reasonableness.
DUMMY ARTICLED TRAINING – ICAI TAKES A TOUGH STAND
The profession of Chartered Accountants
has been facing an impending
threat to its quality from
a significant section of students, who are keen to opt for dummy
practical training. These students
have been concentrating on undertaking
graduation and other
full time courses along with CA
practical training, thereby diluting
their attention on practical training
with Chartered Accountants firms. A good number of Articled Assistants go in for detailed and long coaching classes in
respect of CA curriculum from private teaching institutions,
thereby ignoring the most inevitable part of the course curriculum – that is – the training.
Practical training of 3 years has been a backbone of success of Chartered Accountants and has been providing qualified professionals a great strength in their practical life and empowers them during the training period, to face all kinds of challenges in future. In view of the importance of practical training and the menace of dummy training, the Council of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India had recently taken some significant initiatives, which include:
Practical training of 3 years has been a backbone of success of Chartered Accountants and has been providing qualified professionals a great strength in their practical life and empowers them during the training period, to face all kinds of challenges in future. In view of the importance of practical training and the menace of dummy training, the Council of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India had recently taken some significant initiatives, which include:
- No Chartered Accountant to engage as a teacher with any coaching activity between 9.30 A.M to 5.30 P.M
- CA students directed not to undertake coaching classes between 9.30 A.M. to 5.30 P.M.
- CA students and principals providing training mandated to file yearly declaration that the trainee is regularly attending and his college hours do not clash with the article timings and no coaching is undertaken by him between 9.30 A.M. and 5.30 P.M
- No student to undertake graduation or any other courses between 10.30 A.M. and 5.30 P.M.
- Even to undertake graduation beyond the aforesaid timings a specific permission of Institute would be necessary on the basis of College Principal’s Certificate that there are no classes for the courses between 10.30 A.M. and 5.30 P.M. The principal’s telephone number and address and Chartered Accountant’s recommendation to be forwarded to ICAI for specific permission.
- No flexible working hours can be provided to students for undergoing graduation / post graduation.
- Students currently undertaking graduation courses should comply within 6 months.
- In case of non-compliance by students, they can be debarred from appearing in up to 3 consecutive exams of ICAI besides cancellation of such period of article ship.
- Transfer of CA trainees prohibited except in exceptional circumstances of transfer of parents, specific genuine medical reasons thereby resulting in discontinuation of the CA course for at least a period of 3 months besides in justified circumstances to be approved on case-to-case basis by ICAI.
- Minimum working hours for CA students should be 35 hours in a week.
- Maximum working hours not to exceed 45 hours per week in exceptional circumstances subject to compensatory leave or off hours in lieu of extra working beyond 35 hours.
The Council has taken the aforesaid
decisions unanimously after detailed
deliberations. These decisions are
likely to be implemented in a few
days. All India Chartered Accountants
Society has been raising this
issue for last several months and the
Institute has positively responded in
a very strong manner very fast. The
aforesaid decision of the Council will
go a long way in improving the quality
of Chartered Accountants thereby improving professional opportunities
and image of the profession
very significantly. Our heartiest
congratulations and thanks to the
Institute.