Lower rate of tax under DTAA
Hon’ble Madras High Court in the
matter of CIT vs. Reiter Ingolsteadt
Spimereimaschinenbau AG held that
benefit of lower tax rate will go to
assessee even when the DTA Agreement
was informal by exchange of notes only.
[285 ITR 199].
Withdrawal of registration u/s
12A of the Income Tax Act Hon’ble
Uttaranchal High Court in the matter
of Welham Boys’ School Society vs.
Central Board of Direct Taxes, held that
once registration is granted u/s 12A there
is no inherent power to the registering
authority to rescind it on the ground
that the institution was running for
profit. There is no power in the statute
available to the registering authority
to cancel the registration. Even
assuming that it is possible, it cannot be
cancelled, unless the original registration
was obtained by practicing fraud or
forgery. [285 ITR 74 ].
Attachment of bank
account in respect of disputed
tax by Income tax officials
Hon’ble Bombay High Court
in the matter of Coco Cola
India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Addl. CIT
cautioned the revenue to advise
its officers strictly to follow
the appropriate procedures
and take such coercive action
in case where it is so required
after observing the requirement
of law. Where an appeal
has been filed, no coercive
action can be taken till the
time the appeal is over and after
such period, consider coercive
action, if no application is filed
and if filed, deal with the same
only on merit after considering
the parameter set out by the
Court. [285 ITR 419].
Revisional Jurisdiction
u/s 263 of the Income Tax
Act Hon’ble Rajasthan High
Court in the matter of CIT Vs.
Mangilal Didwania found that
once assessing officer made
enquiries into various aspects
of the case and applied his mind
before framing the assessment,
there is no jurisdiction for
the Commissioner who holds
assessment order as erroneous
and pre-judicial to the interest
of revenue. [286 ITR 126].
Non-resident NGO’s are
liable to pay fringe benefit tax
Hon’ble Authority for Advance
Ruling (Income Tax) in the
matter of Population Council
Inc. given a ruling that
the applicant of non-resident
non-profit making organization,
having a regional office in
India, which carried on
charitable, scientific and
educational activities, was
liable to pay fringe benefit
tax u/s 115WA of the Income
Tax Act, 1961, in relation to
fringe benefits provided to its
employees. [286 ITR 243].