Saturday, February 14, 2015

EXPECTATIONS FROM BUDGET

The Union Budget 2015 is to be presented by the Finance Minister on February 28, 2015. The entire country has major expectations from the government. The country needs simpler and smaller direct tax laws and should give:


  • Tax Policy Roadmap - To provide a stable and reliable tax regime
  • Non adversarial and conducive tax environment
  • Incentivise Growth 
The following major issues also need to be addressed not only for large taxpayers but also more importantly for the common man:

  • Harassment to tax payer - Negative approach of tax laws and department
  • Corruption in tax administration
  • High pitch assessment - With no responsibility on the officers. Even High Court/Tribunal Judgement are ignored
  • Complex legal provisions
  • Uncertainty - Anxiety among business class

The governance needs to be people centric and should ensure maximum governance with minimum government. A time bound delivery and leveraging technology for e-governance can bring suitable solutions.The government may consider following specific suggestions:

  • E-governance: The entire interface between assessee and Income Tax Department including scrutiny,assessment, rectification, refunds and others can be completely managed electronically which should be monitored online by the top management to ensure time bound reply and the solution.
  • Mistrust: The tax law should itself provide for the trust of the tax department on the taxpayer. The various transactions undertaken by the assessee are to be prima facie accepted as genuine and acceptable to the department. Only the cases of tax evasion need to be dealt firmly with stiff penalties.
  • GAAR: The provisions introduced in the Income Tax Act in respect of GAAR should be removed.
  • Investment Incentive: The investment allowance need to be provided to SME also and can be increased to boost 'Make in India'.
  • Voluntary Disclosure: The assessees can be permitted to disclose income without any need to explain the source. The declaration of assessee that the source is not from corruption or crime can be taken.
  • Tax Slabs: Assessees having income less than `10,00,000 need to be taxed at 5% and 10% in two slabs rather than 10% and 20% as at present. The maximum marginal rate can be reduced to 25%.
  • MAT: Benefit of carry forward losses including depreciation to be fully given in all stages before imposing MAT. Artificial dis allowances in this regard need to be done away with. MAT on SEZ needs to be scrapped.
  • Domestic Transfer Pricing provisions have no relevance and are complicating the law without meeting any objectives.
  • The provisions of Section 56 relating to tax ability of real estate transactions on the basis of circle rates, tax ability of share premium and deemed income on transfer of shares other than at book value are irrational and are unjustified. These provisions are seriously hampering businesses.
  • Advanced Ruling cannot be restricted only to large domestic tax payers involving more than ` 100 crore. This should be extended to all assessee, being the constitutional right to equality.
  • HUF: Hindu Undivided Family needs to be incentivized with higher exemption limits to promote joint family and old Indian culture. Special deduction for education per member below 25 years, health per member above 60 years, health and accident cover for all members and special allowance towards payment to senior citizens should be provided for as a deduction.
  • Deemed Income: The taxation needs to be levied only on real income. The artificial rules including Taxable Income Computation Standards cannot be allowed to be different from Indian GAAP and international accounting standards based on historical cost Principles.
  • Refunds: Large refunds are still not being given without persuasion and personal follow up. The system needs to take care and should ensure timely refunds, with time bound verification's of returns.
  • Appeals: The appeals by department should be based on professional judgment. The legal judgment of even non jurisdictional ITAT and High courts, need to be binding on the department except in case, conflicting judgments are there.
  • Scrutiny: The scrutiny assessment should be undertaken only in exceptional cases and limited to specific issues.
There are many other important areas where complex provisions need to be withdrawn and simpler basis for taxation needs to be adopted.

0 comments:

Post a comment